Very interesting, almost ambient opening, which takes some time to develop. One minute in, and we are still building up steam, away from what almost sounds like wind and rain in the left channel beating concrete.
Normally I'm not patient enough to let a piece develop like this, but in this case, it's very well mixed and atmospheric, pads taking you to a new world. Very good job panning everything around, keeping things wet and verby without bogging down the low mids. That, I'm quite impressed with.
Up to 2:19 now as we are picking up speed. The organ-like synth is doing a great job holding us down. 2:37 we're getting some peaks over the eye of the hurricane, which are extremely well orchestrated.
Man, I did not believe you when you said 5 minute buildup, but that takes some talent to orchestrate while keeping interest. Your progression is very well done throughout here. I feel like I'm waiting for deadmau5 to walk on set at a concert, haha.
3:56, there is just a bit of mud on your impact. I would see if I could cut down on that to a degree, now that the bass is becoming clearer and clearer.
At 4:30, very nice and clear again. I'm anxiously anticipating what is to come.
Nice modulations at 4:55 and a sudden break from the 5 minute intro. Nice bitcrush at 5:06.
I'm not sure what I was expecting at 5:19, but possibly something a bit more intense. The bass feels just a bit more pushed back than I'd like.
At 5:42, the hihats are the only thing in that freq range and probably could be pushed down correspondingly -- and possibly wet. Same with the snare. And I would perhaps experiment with giving the kick some air/grit/presence over them due to the very ambient nature of your backing synths. Something doesn't sit quite right with me about leaning into fizzy upper percussion high in the mix relative to washy synths.
Same with shaker accents through 7:45... and I should clarify that your semi-open hi-hats are fine. It's the closed hat chiks and I'm talking about.
By 8:12 the snare is a bit tamer relative. So perhaps adjusting the volume leading UP to this section would do far better than reducing it across the board. I actually feel that at 8:44 it's a bit quieter than it could be -- by about .2 dB. That may be on the part of compression as well, which appears to be tight, but appropriate for house.
I realize I haven't said so much as a word about your chosen chord progression yet. That's because I really like it.
09:52, the ship underbelly creak-esque FX are such a nice touch. I wish I heard just a bit more of them. As we wind down, they're a bit more apparent, and I enjoy that very much.
Overall, this track shines in its intro. If you'd asked me before if I'd like to listen to something with a 5 minute intro, I'd say no, but you've changed my mind. Very astounding work there. The body of the track as a whole is perfectly serviceable house, nice and groovy.
Great work. Very ambitious premise, and promise delivered. :)