ADR3-N's audio Reviews on Newgrounds

[Mr.Market]

I'm sitting at 00:40, and so far good development of elements but the progression seems slower than it should be into melodic/bass material. You have a lot of cool ideas and interesting composition.

I once was listening to a channel by a guy named Kush, and he said a great idea is to add 2 things and take 2 away for each transition. A man by the name of Adam Neely said "repetition legitimizes." Take what you will from that, but I think some study of song structure will do you really nice. That bass riff at 01:39 slaps, and I was sad to only hear it clearly for like 5 seconds!

I think you are on the cusp of discovering who you are as a song writer, and you will get there. Keep studying. Keep writing. Keep doing what you do, and never let anyone dissuade you from following your passion, whether you intend to keep it as a hobby, or turn it into a job.

Also, the piano at the end was random, lol.

Thanks for coming out to NGUAC!

AthosBR64 responds:

i appreciate that you make a whole review about my song.thank you very much for the feedback!

[Dim Dimension]

I love your lead writing throughout and your chord structure.

I don't have much critique beyond those related to software and mixing. Obviously, drum samples could be better, and it could use mastering and compression. I have tons of freebies hiding out in my newsposts if you would be interested to sift through.

I think the track as a whole would benefit from bringing up your kick and snare in the mix, turning down reverb and delay wet signals, and experimenting with panning.

Beyond that, the piece holds together really well and is well structured. Your ideas are clear. At no point am I ever bored. It moves on with a definite idea of what it is and where it's going. Great job in that regard.

The bass is not obtrusive but could be taken down a slight amount.

Thanks for coming out to NGUAC!

AnnieHer responds:

Yeah, experimenting with stuff is pretty fun. And as I improve with time I will understand how to properly use every part of my toolkit! Thanks for the feedback

[AniGleb - Inner blast]

Хочу сказать, что давно не писала отзыв на русском, но стараюсь, чтобы вам более или менее понятно то, что думаю о песне.

В общем, она классна, громкость разных инструментов ровно балансирована. Барабаны четко бьют, и прекрасно слышу их характеристики. Сжатие канала мастер также звучит вполне нормально и не мешает. Этим я всегда удивляюсь, слушая от новых исполнителей на нашем сайте. Значит что 2 года с нами не зря потрачены!))

Дроп второй неплохой. Только хотела услышать немножко побольше басовых частот среднего диапазона от 01:21 к 01:46, или, возможно, больше суббасов. Ревущему басу это поможет.

Кроме того что структура и мелодии песни относительно просты, у меня другой критики нет. Спасибо за вдохновляющую работу, и что пришли на NGUAC!

If someone speaking English wants to know what I said, you can copy the text and paste it to Reverso Context or another Russian translator :)

AniGlebGD responds:

Glad to hear that! And thanx you caring about language.)

[Laurie's Interlude]

This piece is pretty quiet, and there is a high pitched ringing in one of my ears over 20khz. It's louder than a lot of the other elements.

HOWEVER the vocal elements are enchanting, and the ride cymbals are nice. I would just bring the metal dings down very slightly.

Beyond the low volume, very hard ringing, I don't have much critique. I think the piano could do with some more gentle velocity, and not be layered in that lower register on the chords. I think that detracts from how ethereal the track as a whole sounds.

But overall, wonderful atmosphere and great work. It was a pleasure to hear and very relaxing!

Thanks for coming out to NGUAC!

anadevar responds:

Thanks a lot! It is nice to hear that.

[Battle Spirit - Quest to Kill God OST]

I don't have much if any critique. A bit less volume on your offbeat stabs and I think the leveling will be as good as can be.

I want to hear just a bit more of your counter melody.

The lowpass transition is a nice touch. Just a bit less volume on the snare coming in during the transition and it will be perfect.

The piece and melodies flow with effortless simplicity. Wonderful work. Takes me back to playing gameboy color, with better sound quality :P

Thanks for coming out to NGUAC!

amishpimp responds:

Thank you so much for the feedback, I really appreciate it!

[Tempest]

Great rain sample in the beginning and transition out of that.

Your composition is fantastic. I recommend doubletracking that guitar-like synth to the left and right; you may use two different instruments and slightly different amps to achieve a wider feel.

Your 808 is a bit loud in the sub range. Recommend turning down the sub so as not to drown out other elements of the track. In fact I might sub it out for a saturated saw instrument entirely. If you are partial to the sine, up the volume somewhat and turn down the very low frequencies manually with EQ. The rest of the track is simply not loud enough to support it.

The section at 2:20 is beautiful. Turn down rain very slightly. Possibly pan it around or add in other whooshy FX to taste. I trust your judgement.

We resume for a chorus at 3:12 with the same aforementioned issues, until 3:27 when we get into a nice synth line. UwU

I have a hard time picking out your kick drum. May process it with something like KSHMR Essentials Kick.

The next section through 4:20 blew my mind for a hit second, even with such minimal arrangement. I would not use the sub bass so high up and may switch to a more subtle instrument, or bring it down one octave.

The drum kit here is very slightly getting on my nerves, as it doesn't do your writing justice. For one, I would turn it up a notch. For two, the velocities on the hi-hats stand out as either not very sensitive or almost all the same. Shop for some free drum kits or samples and see what happens.

You may also benefit for writing each and every part of the drum kit to a different track and apply various FX and processing to them, again to your taste.

Solo at 5:30 is SLAPPING. Could use some delay, reverb, panning, chorus, etc to your tastes. It just sounds like it's laying on top of the track in the center. Particularly obvious when it's soloed. Beyond that though, it is so well played that I don't care too much. Just a little sensitive atmospheric touch would bring it from noice to epic.

The track itself is quiet and would benefit from a free internet master or your own hand at compression on the master channel -- OR just using the amplify effect in Audacity.

All in all, very nice cohesive piece, limited seemingly only what your software and mixing can at present do. Save this and other works of the same quality for a rainy day, when you can revisit them and bring your vision to life. It's fabulous.

Thanks for coming out to NGUAC!

Aardvark04 responds:

Hey thank you so much for the review! I fully agree with all of your feedback and greatly appreciate how constructive it is.

[Insert title here. Song made with computer]

Really interesting track with tons of smooth chords. It's hard for me to pick out the overall structure.

Listen to the reverb tail at the end of your track. There are a lot of overlapping frequencies. I think applying a gate or shortening the reverb tail would benefit the intelligibility of your song.

I really enjoy the stabs at 0:47. I think they're great, nice chords, very grooveable.

I can't really hear your cymbals well in the background. Your hihat is a bit loud relative to the rest of the track.

The transition at 0:36 I think should be longer and more obviously build into your next chorus -- this is what I was talking about with song structure. You have lots of great ideas here but I'm not entirely able to follow them beyond that lovely chorus.

I think a found-sound type snare with an overtone of a Bb5/A#5 would go nicely on beat 4 where you have that hihat hitting.

The track itself is short. Personally I could listen to your chorus for 3 minutes straight. Nice little club vibe, super relaxed. I think what hampers you from doing that is your transitions. They're a bit short, sometimes less than two measures. I could hear that beginning at 0:04 up to 4 times for atmospheric purposes.

With reverse crashes and so on, this point might become moot. You could signal transitions with whooshing crescendos and FX. If you lack those kinds of samples, check out Bedroom Producer's Blog. Tons of gems there.

Throughout I'm having a hard time hearing what I think is supposed to be an 808, and there seems to be residual noise from your stabs hanging out in that low middle piano register.

Other than that, I was having a rough day, and listening to this chilled me straight out. There's definitely something to be said for that.

Thanks for coming out to NGUAC!

BottleTopBillFanclub responds:

Thank you. I appreciate the feedback.

[Goam]

Oh this feels olskool. I dig it. Remembering when I didn't have anything but a sampler to work with.

I think that distorted bass can come down a dB or two.

Before I dive in, I want to say that I LOVE this kind of music. If you keep improving your mixing and sound design, I see a wonderful future for you as a very creative electronic music producer. This is raw and out of the box. I don't have a ton of tips for you, as the track is quite minimal, but having said this I will now listen again and do a more thorough pass.

I really enjoy the chopped guitar samples. On the same note, they give great atmosphere. I would recommend for lower octaves you have a separate track with low tuned guitar samples. I also recommend learning to double track with samples.

Doubletracking - two tracks, one panned 100% left, one panned 100% right, playing the same or very similar melodic content (and may include different FX like different amps and EQ) to give the illusion of a fuller sound. It's used in rock and metal for the rhythm guitar, where usually the guitarist will play the stuff twice and pan one take L and one R, with slightly different settings.

YOU on the other hand can just find two samples of guitar chops (if it's not the same note, you can change the pitch in the sampler) to make this illusion. I think it'd sound really cool here.

For your bass, I would not actually choose that note at 0:32, at least without writing a moving bass line. I'd pick the tonic (usually the bass note) of the guitar chords you're working with, just to keep it simple. Some other instrument can play that nice little dissonant note there.

I'd like if that section with the bass was repeated elsewhere like a chorus -- learning to write with a song structure will speed your development drastically as a producer btw, highly recommend.

I like your kick but I'm having a hard time hearing it over your bass. I think it would sound nice if sidechain was applied. I'm missing snares, hi-hats, and cymbals/transition FX.

Those spoopy melodies toward the end are SICK and really tie your piece together. Will be stuck in my head!

-----

This concludes the actual review portion

I don't know whether you're working with a PC or mobile app given the track complexity. However I have some recommendations for you for free synths and samples, which I will try to list here.

Free drums: Elsita soviet drum machine, MT Power Drum kit (super simple rock kit), Adreanaline sample pack (in my news posts), Bedroom Producer's blog has tons

Free FX: KSHMR Essentials Kick -- for processing percussion essentially all at once, DIABLO Lite by Cymatics, also for percussion

Free synths: MeowSynth can do crazy shit if you check my track LUCY. I'm sure you can figure out how to do more with it if you can make samplers sound this good. I also recommend Basic65 which is a commodore 64 synth

Free mastering: Soundcloud mastering, Bandlab, Music gateway

Hope you find something here to chew on. I'm excited to see what you come up with in the future.

Thanks for coming out to NGUAC!

AVKid4 responds:

Oh wow, jesus man thank you so much! That's all incredibly helpful

[Liquid Lullaby]

I may have a bit of hearing loss, but it sounds like the left channel is a bit heavier than the right.

As a composition, this is wonderful, coherent, and pleasant to listen to! I may have some qualms with mix choice or instruments, particularly the bells, but other than that your talent and knowledge of music theory is clear to see. :)

I will dive now into nitpicking below.

First item of nitpicking -- overall volume. I think a free internet mastering service could be of great help here, or if you are not a fan, apply compression to your taste before you mix down your track. Audacity will also allow you to amplify an MP3 just under the point of damaging clipping, if you prefer no compression at all (and that's perfectly okay)

The piano is somewhat muffled in comparison to the ride bells coming in your intro. If you desire them to be that way, I would bring up the volume. I also think the leads through 1:06 are a bit loud. I would take them down by up to 1.3 dB. I hear an octave hiding underneath the lead around 36 seconds to 1:00 and on. Might be two octaves. You could either bring that out and pan it, or layer it in the same octave. I think it should sound better to bring it in on for a final chorus, where it is not hiding, as I can hear the lead cut off, and the accompaniment hold the same note for half a second longer.

The piece itself has great choices in instrumentation and arrangement. No complaints there. It manages to sound both classic, somehow Christmasy, and belonging to a cheery videogame/anime shopping scene at the same time. However it is quite mid heavy and low-mid heavy on the mix, leading to a boxy sound. I want to hear some more of that 8k-18k!

I think close to the outro, the high bass clashes somewhat with the rest of the arrangement 1:45

You could bring that bass down there, or bring it down one octave. One thing I notice, the bass seems to have some formant shifting going on, as well as a delay, and sounds very, very soft on the attack -- is that a frequency comb or bit crush that I'm hearing? I think those would sound much nicer without any delay or reverb of any kind, to just let your bass unapologetically be itself. You want as little noise muddying those low frequencies as possible, or each time you hop to another note, you're going to get clashing frequencies.

All the considerations I mentioned above would bring the bottom end more to the forefront and vary the timbre more. You may also try bringing the sub down in volume. I notice that also is quite loud relative to the "head" of the bass, and it makes the rest of the track sound out of balance. To get more presence out of a bass you can experiment with distortion/amps.

Your percussion could use a bit of a facelift with some light transient shaping -- kick/snare. The cymbals would benefit from playing with width. You may also play with humanization on those velocities a bit more and thin out the lower mid range on what seems to be functioning as a ride cymbal at 1:28. It's quite loud relative to the bells you have going on. Personally I would take it down and crescendo all the way through 1:59, maybe with slow motion panning around, because motion is everything.

The bells on this section, while adding Christmas spirit, are muddying into each other, making individual rhythms on the same key hard to hear. Playing with accents, reducing reverb and reverb length, and decluttering the piano roll of multiple notes can help with that. You may also take the harmony you want and move it to a separate instance of the instrument with slightly different panning. I use this trick frequently.

I think your crashes could actually use long reverb tails and the occasional reverse crash leading up to them for transitions. I'm super fond of that and think it would work wonders for the big transitions in your piece to make them more dramatic.

As I listen more and more, I start to focus on your kick. I'm not sure if you designed it yourself -- have you considered tuning your kick to the tonic of your track, and tuning the sub? You can accomplish the first with a simple guitar tuner plugin and the pitch wheel of your sampler, if used. Following that, KSHMR Essentials Kick would be a nice quick fix to choose a sub note, fix transients, widen, etc, to your liking. It seems boxy in the 250 hz range to me.

The snare by itself does not sound bad but seems to be having issues cutting through. A little more processing would probably do the trick, focusing on transient shaping, saturation, bit crush, width, clipping... You may also think to tune your snare accordingly.

Overall, it's a great listen, a very whimsical, fun piece to sift through. I really enjoyed it.

Thanks for coming out to NGUAC!

314leafcutterant responds:

Thank you for this very in depth review. I'll try to implement some of your ideas in my future work. Do you think I'll make it past the tryouts?

[No One's Gain]

I really think you should link the YT video for this here. Together it is a masterful presentation. I love it. No critique, just love.

LexRodent responds:

Been thinking about linking the videos I've made for my tracks on the author comments.
I usually leave them for my news post, but might as well give it a try.

Glad you enjoyed it !