ADR3-N's audio Reviews on Newgrounds

[Everlasting]

I think the vinyl cracking effect is a bit much at 35 seconds. I'm double checking myself to make sure it isn't clipping on my end.

Your transitions sound very smooth, which I like. I enjoy the thickness at 1 minute

1:12 I would like a bass that stuck out more against your snare. You could simply take away a bit of that low pass filter on the lower notes to give it some depth.

Your percussion leveling is perfect with the exception of hihats which are a bit too heavy for my liking.

2:40 hihats are REALLY up there. Almost painful relative to the bass, which sounds noice btw

I think 3:19 transition is abrupt and somewhat unnecessary relative to 3:30 and after.

Beyond that, really enjoyed the listen. Thanks for coming out to NGUAC!

[Partialism - Windows XP [NGUAC 2022]]

I don't think any of the ideas you showcase here are bad. It sounds like it was made in basic 65 for sure, but it's not bad.

What it suffers from is relative unintelligibility -- separating the quiet from the loud sections, what is a verse, what is a chorus, can the bass be heard clearly throughout and is it supported by clearly audible kick, snare, etc. I think it would benefit you most to try a hybrid of this type of work and more easily heard percussion such as that of the sega genesis. Also, pulse bass may work better.

The mix itself is pretty quiet and gets muddy at points when there is too much going on. Fix that and I think it'd sound just fine!

I still enjoyed the listen. Thanks for coming out to NGUAC!

Tetriform responds:

Thanks for the feedback!
I have been experimenting with 16-bit a lot more lately, but mixing is still a sticking point
It is definitely something I need practice with but the important thing is having ideas to begin with, and unfortunately they don't come as easy as they did :/
I think I will enter a 16-bit composition next year, by which time my mixing abilities should hopefully have improved :)

Cheers
Jack

[Species]

Not bad! I think your lead at 1:27 could come down by quite a bit and the reverb could be cut down on most instruments with the exception of at 1:50 for effect.

Beyond that, the piece is pretty banging. Your drops are a standout to me for the genre, especially with what sounds like those descending bongos.

Thanks for coming out to NGUAC!

rajbeatsofficial responds:

thanks for listening & for the detailed feedback ADR3-N!! i appreciate it <3

[Madness, Act 3]

Up to 1:11 I have no comments beyond you could probably use nicer synths and more velocity editing for your snares and synths. I recommend slightly less reverb.

Your writing is fantastic though, as is your phrasing. I really enjoyed the listen.

Level wise I would bring down the timpani very slightly, your snare more to the front with less reverb, and spread out the panning a bit more. Anything that is long notes or repeated notes, I would add less reverb to.

Beyond instrument quality and a little of mix, I have not much critique if any. Keep doing what you do.

Thanks for coming out to NGUAC!

Rhombys responds:

Thank you for taking the time for your critique, and your listen!

[Sample - Robbin Dat Bank]

Песня заставляет меня чувствовать себя, будто я стала глупее чем раньше и не понимаю откуда вся эта страха.

I think what this track lacks is a solid bassline to tie everything together. It feels like noise, stress, and a little bit of banjo kazooie. The structure is just fine. I'm not sure what else to say about it. Even the mix is not bad, just feels kind of as it were dropped for a joke. Sorry if that is not the intention!

Thanks for coming out to NGUAC!

[He'll knock all day]

I appreciate how strange this piece is but not the velocity of those open hihats being the exact same on repeat hits. That's very distracting. I would take down the open hihat level.

You manage to make synth guitars sound alright so there's that.

For your outro, I think the synths besides the sax are a bit too loud.

The mix is clean due to minimal treatment of the entire track as a whole. I'm not sure about some chord choices, particularly in the intro. And I'm not sure what to make about the track. Very interesting!

Thanks for coming out to NGUAC!

SirSandman0 responds:

thanks for the feedback!

[echo]

As much as I adore chip distortion and emulation, I think you are doing your kick a disservice by chip distorting it. The effect 43 seconds is nice with the chip percussion but I think the mix is pretty muddy.

Any synth that is holding long tones should sit underneath the rest of the mix.

1:35 that run is super cool, but the mix is underwhelming. You just have a really cool percussion line existing on top of the same chorus we've already heard.

That said this piece is nicely varied and is not JUST the same thing over and over despite holding onto the same lead line. I appreciate that. You try to keep it interesting.

Nice work. Thanks for coming out to NGUAC!

[¡Hurry Walker!]

Chosing to keep the 1st chord from the beginning and work only around that is an interesting choice, not necessarily one I like. I think 1:19 is the strongest part of this piece.

I'm not sure what to say other than that since the last time I heard from you, your mix, arrangement, and writing are improving substantially, which I'm glad to hear.

1:40 I think your lead is much too loud.

I'm not sure really where this piece is going and so don't feel as if I can give quite proper critique beyond that I recommend some study of music theory and song structure. Signals Music Studios is a great youtube channel to check out for an easy crash course in this. I think it would vastly improve your ability to put out ideas like these, which are not bad at all by themselves, and bring them together in a way that translates your vision to your listeners.

Thanks for coming out to NGUAC!

[Dance of the dead]

Composition wise, I really enjoy this, even if it's a little simplistic and relies heavily on reverb for effect -- and is short. Nice work setting the mood. The piece very much matches what you describe, a somber, wonky little dance of dead men.

Mix wise, I would take down the reverb somewhat. Everything seems relatively in its place beyond that, likely owing to the simplicity of the piece.

I think this would make a nice intro into a grungy, sad metal ballad. As is, it feels somewhat incomplete.

Thanks for coming out to NGUAC!

CielOuvert responds:

Thank you, I do believe it could mesh into a more upbeat style later on. I'll have to experiment a little with that.

[The Key to the Insanity]

My comments will be mostly about mix, as I think the composition isn't bad. The high frequencies are overwhelmingly loud - hihat, etc., and the bass is very quiet relative to the rest of the track.

The bass should sit in the center of the track and support the rest of the composition. I think switching out for a different bass instrument would help tremendously.

Спасибо что пришли на NGUAC!