ADR3-N's audio Reviews on Newgrounds

[Timeless Ibis]

Could benefit from a master -- the mix is quiet!
But writing is fantastic. There are a few bones I have to pick with mix, such as kick and snare not always being upfront and clear, but overall is clean and easy to hear all important elements

Great work!

death2go responds:

Thanks! I definitely can understand needing to try to make the mix louder and polish up on a mastering, though, Though, it feels odd that it renders out quieter than what the DAW is that, i found out recently that my Master mixer Volume Exceeds what a lot of people would consider normal mixing volume, so I've been adjusting that and trying to experiment on trying to increase the volume so it matches closer to other songs. I don't like the idea of someone having to turn their volume up to listen to this, then going to another song and getting blasted because they forgot to adjust their volume. maybe whenever I understand it a bit more later down the line, I'll go through the songs that have this issue and update them! Thanks for the review! It means alot!!

[Evidence Of A Creator]

Could benefit from mastering for volume level (the mix is FANTASTIC), but otherwise, this is a stellar piece, with great modulations and lead writing. Sounds like something straight out of Final Fantasy 13-2. Like discovering time travel. Nice!

DarkGod666 responds:

Appreciate the comparison! I love the more experimental vibe of that ost. I suppose I could have clipped the transients more and pushed up the volume a bit, yeah.

[TOXICITY]

Came here to drop 5 because I like phonk
I think I would prefer less compression but overall, once the vocal comes in, I'm impressed by how nearly understandable it is. Noice

Shark-Pool responds:

Thanks for the support! Will take it into consideration for future tracks :)

[Casporb - 100 MPH]

Arrangement wise, perfect.

I think I would like a little less compression, .1 dB more hihat on drops, some panning play on hihats for builds, perhaps a bit less reverb, like say 10% less, and a little more sub. It's not easy to hear it.

But otherwise great!

Casporb responds:

Thanks for the advice! I'm glad you enjoyed.

[Online Musician - Rock Instrumental (Demo)]

It sounds like you have multiple melodies on the same shreddage instance -- there's some low string getting triggered occasionally that shouldn't be there

I love shreddage so much. so common sense. sounds good what you have, but I wish there was more!

Some things I recommend
less reverb on your rhythm guitar, and double track them
more volume on kick and snare
more volume on counter melody, chorus FX????
experiment with panning and try to maintain a bit cleaner sound
experiment with FX on drums such as gentle verb on snare

carbonlad responds:

Thanks.

[Livewire]

Wow, that reverb or whatever the hell you got in your intro is WILD. I think your synth is a bit loud in the intro to 42 sec though

The track sounds a bit empty at 50 sec, but the things you're doing here are more complex than they sound. I think I'd like a few percs or other melodic elements to distract from that empty space there.

Very cool ideas here and I really enjoy your play with FX

The piece is a bit short but I think you pushed it as far as you could without it becoming stale. Great work -- a few more ideas and I feel it would be complete

BigTWONeli responds:

Thank you for the criticism, Nobody ever gives me any so I 100% appreciate it

[B!aku - Love u no More]

There's some grammar errors in english that don't make sense to me because the correct grammar would sound just as good -- taked instead of took -- but I'm going to completely ignore that because it doesn't matter

This song would BANG fantastically if the mix was better. It sounds like each instrument, including the vocal is mixed too loudly or distorting somehow, and the mix is crowded. The low-mid and bass range is especially crowded it sounds. I notice this most around 1:09 on the backing vocal.

However at this time I'll say that I LOVE your writing. I would just prefer less distortion.

I would also like the acoustic guitar to be mixed to sound more thin and perhaps pick a side to pan to.

I would remove a lot of reverb from the keys and other instruments for bigger sections, as acoustic guitar is getting lost in that.

Otherwise, I listened twice! Nice work!

Biakuu responds:

Thank u so much for your observations!! i really apreciate them a lot.
sorry for the grammar, english is not my native lenguage as you can tell, but i try to learn along the way.

I know i could have mixed better, If I had given myself the time to, maybe it was the hype to upload the song, it's a pretty experimental piece as well, so i'll be working on that point the next one!!

im so glad u liked my lyrics, it's a little tedious to capture the feelings i want to project, and being so, I am very encouraged by the fact that they seems to hit the bullseye!!

again, thank u so much for giving yourself the time to analyze my work, i promise i will keep it in mind for my next songs, witch i would love that you hear, see u next time, hope you're having great day!!

[Kentucky (Finale)]

Nice! I see a lot of names I recognize on that thank you list :) I love the community here.

I'm appreciating what you're doing with distortion in your intro, nice and cinematic. I think when the lead comes in at around 30 sec it could be panned around or pingpong delayed for effect. It and the distortion are quite bright tonally and stand out from your bass in a way that's not quite what I would expect.

The sidechain makes up for it some, but overall I think your side chain elements, lead, and bass, are too loud for your snare to cut through. Overall good chords through here and varied instrumentation.

At 2:07 that sax sounds a bit clumsy, the bari. It's very verbed out through here, we lose sight of the bass, and I can really hear how loud these are when we have them alone with the house bass/kick/hat. That bigroom kick should take up a lot more space!

I would take down reverb here by a LOT. But I praise the vision and the cross genre work, as well as your consistent theme.

This track shines in its variety and sticking to a theme. The reverb is really hurting it by a lot as the low end shoegaze wash is muddying any limiting, compression, covering up finer areas of mix.

Really though, I find your writing to be a treat. The kick at 4:39 could be tuned to follow the bass line so it doesn't clash with the bass. On the minor i chord it does fine but otherwise the sub clashes with the ... I forget what to call that chord oh well.

Otherwise, really enjoyed the track. Outro section was a pleasant departure there. Watch for clipping at 6:29.

My advice, mix at a quieter volume and keep things clean on your eq. Watch for frequencies below 250 hz on non bass instruments. They will get in the way of bass. Sidechain is your friend but will not fix all mix woes. Snare and kick should be loudest parts of mix, followed by lead and bass. The rest is to your personal taste as long as hi-hat and crash are not sticking out. Beyond that, reverb wash can be turned up on a long cut off or transition and back down for the rest of the track. It can even be sidechained on big sections, mind you. There is so much one can do for clarity.

Best of luck in all your future endeavors. Thanks for coming out to NGUAC!

50Steaks responds:

I went through, copied the file and implemented most of the stuff you mentioned here to hear how it sounds. I agree that the snare and kick do fall into the background at times but part of my goal with this track was to mix louder than I usually do for the purposes of filling the whole waveform at the guitar solo. Fine tuning the kick is actually a really good idea and helps make that part sound a little better. Given that I use the mobile version, I can’t really tell what hz is where on the little param eq they give you, but then I noticed that I actually boosted the bass frequencies on the sax which was just a bad idea.

Removing the reverb entirely from some instruments at the end makes that part sound cleaner, but at other points bringing the reverb back in for transitions and the guitar part doesn’t really feel right to me.

But your suggestion on sidechaining reverb gives me the best of both worlds. I get to have a cleaner kick while keeping the vibe and atmosphere of the song as it is. I just have to do it manually through an automation track on the mix. I will definitely be doing that in future tracks, that’s for sure.

I’m intrigued by your lack of feedback on the guitar solo, I guess that means I did a good job there.

Thanks for your detailed feedback. You gave me an extra half star as compared to my score from last year so that’s a plus at least. I still have yet to make it to the next round but I guess that’ll have to wait till 24.