Short piece, but fraught with tension. Wish there were a proper outro. Interesting.
Short piece, but fraught with tension. Wish there were a proper outro. Interesting.
thnx
Interesting melody here, but I'm noticing a theme here, overly wet FX on 4-step arps. I do like the diminished chords though!
i'll work on dat moisture ;3
Hmm, I pretty much agree with Paranoid's review, except for one point -- it's not that your drum samples are super loud -- it's that they're boxy in the low mid range and really dry sounding. Maybe a gated reverb on your bongos would fix it?
dude, i really apprieciate your reviews :D
thank you so much for taking the time to help me man! if you ever wanna work on something together lemme know, you seem nice :)
I'm not really seeing any overarching melodies, percussion, or anything here aside from your arp. Doesn't necessarily sound offensive, but just not very exciting either.
I'll work on it
Thnk u ouo
I like the idea here but this sounds pretty unbalanced. Normally the problem with new dubstep makers is the percussion -- not being able to hear it specifically. What this sounds like is the percussion is too loud over the drop, no side-chain, and backing pads too reverbed up.
Turn that reverb send on your pads down, cut the low end on it, and bring them down a little.
Kick and snare are okay until 0:24 where you can see we have some peak distortion. If this is just an idea you're doing some light mixing on, you can clap an emergency limiter on it as a bandaid but I recommend just avoiding it at all costs.
I try to mix everything so that the entire track peaks at no more than -6 dB on the master channel before I even touch it. This approach totally avoids the peaking problem is why, mostly. That and when you do apply compression -- which it sounds like this piece has not had, you also avoid over-compressing, to some degree.
Now to side-chaining, if you haven't had any experience with this, I recommend plugins like fabfilter C2 or sidekick6, but you can do it by hand if absolutely need be. Basically, you have your bass line, and whenever your kick/snare hit, you duck your bass and sometimes other synths so the kick/snare don't have to push THROUGH the low frequency noise to get to your ears. It's so prevalent now that a lot of people use it, even in genres like metal.
I also note the lack of a sub under your wobble synth, and the wobbles themselves aren't compressed. Something to work on.
That said, good dubstep standard composition going on. I'm excited to see you improve in the time to come. :)
Thank you very much for your advices :)
Dubstep is a music genre that iI haven't already tried it was my first time.
I made this in one hour because I was bored and I actually wasn't expecting anyone to listen to this. I'm ok on the point that the pads have too much reverb and low end .
I actually have experience with sidechain, I tried to do the compressor method, lfo tool, kickstart and gross beat, I also used automation clips on the volume (not in this) and I didn't think to add it so thank you vor the advice once again. I'm ok with the entire comment, you're right but I had two problems during the making of this music:
- I don't have a good computer and my cpu was dead at like 11 tracks on the playlist
- It was my first time experiencing the serum plugin and I didn't know how to create growls
btw I'm not english so if my response may have grammary problems (I mean It's still a problem) but I don't speak engliah fluently
Thank you very much for giving me good advice :)
I nearly fainted when I thought I heard copyrighted Pendulum snare samples -- thank God I checked the reviews and it's just a sample pack.
This is crazy in a good way. My only complaint is slight sibilance, what sounds like really, really hard compression, and relatively no sub-bass to give those drums something to lock us into. I had to turn things down a bit to enjoy fully but still can't tell if that phantom pain in my left ear is from listening to this at 50% volume or not. These ATH-M40x's monitor headphones drive ridiculously hard and have a very flat response, no bass boost, so it's possible this may sound better on some commercial gear.
I'm actually listening on 8% volume right now and it's at the sweet spot between crisp and uncomfortably loud with that perc.
Compositionally, a great piece that keeps me guessing. I'm not a huge fan of the piano -- I could have gone for a more muted, foom-y lead with some delay, perhaps even an octave lower with higher octave doubled stab synths in places for effect. It would sound much more pensive and ominous. I do love the creative approach to sound design in general though.
That descending synth at 0:11 was pretty uncomfortably sibilant to me on my first listen. Maybe supplement it with a sine or ramp bass drop.
I think the piano leads may be a bit too loud, and perhaps that's why I'm not perceiving the bass as well. I took time for a second listen -- let's be honest, it still keeps me on my toes even after a third time through; you're very good with this, one reason of many I appreciate your genre switchups. Each time I noticed the piano leads, which don't really have an overarching melody, seemed even louder than the drums and bass combined. There's really nothing in that sonic space to compete with them either, so they seem doubly loud.
Other than that though, fantastic work. Congrats on the fp!
Woohoo, adr reviews!
Lol, 8% volume?? I must be deaf. I force myself to lower from max volume because my ears don't work that well and I dont want to make them worse. 8%, you ear saving person you.
It might be time I get some new cans. I've had the same AKGs for a number of years now. Id get some decent monitors but am currently living in an RV. The boyfriend and I will be getting a house soon though and 100 spare monitors will be the first things I buy.
Copy written Pendulum snares? They spam amen breaks, they dont own those fonts XD
That opening chord tho. Also, synths sound great there.
I could do without a lot of the reverb here -- cut low end, reduce wet signal, etc.
I'm impressed you managed to emulate the koto relatively convincingly. With a bit more humanization, modulation, and a less rigid gridded attack on each note, you might have me fooled. As is, it sounds like a pretty cool soundfont. You should definitely release a little preset file for us broke kiddos who can't afford giant sample libraries, heheh.
Compositionally, this is beautiful VGM/anime-grade music. Modulations in all the right places. Traditional flourishes. Dynamic contrast. It's great. The only real complaint I have is the slight lack of contrast between sections.
Otherwise, right up my alley, but I can definitely hear the time constraint in this piece. I was hoping for a solid B section in here. Still, gorgeous piece nonetheless.
Thanks for coming out to NGUAC!
Thanks for the review, will consider those in my VIP track
Right off the bat, cool acid vibe, but that super loud reverb is doing you no favors. I almost always recommend against reverbing kicks; even when you cut the low end on the wet, damp it good, and lower the wet signal, you always get this low rumbly tin can hangover. It just doesn't sound good.
Super cool that you've gone out of the box and made your own sounds in Harmor rather than relying on samples. I just can't really make out a lot of what's going on with that reverb. If I'm not crazy, either, I hear some distorting in the right channel around 2:12.
Six minutes is also a lot of time to develop a piece. I'm unsure if this is intended to sound like a really long house set in which the DJ deliberately avoids touching anything for most of the goings on, but that's kind of what I'm hearing in between a lot of the same elements being repeated, no real deviation from the same home key, etc.
In short, I'm not really sure what you're trying to do, the super loud kick and reverb is covering up a lot of the good things you are doing, and though I actually like a lot of aspects of your sound design, it takes so long to develop, I can't enjoy it. By 4:33 I'm actually starting to get a bit of a headache from the heavy low mids.
I also feel like the melodic development there could have easily been cropped once you realized its potential, and the track condensed into the standard verse, chorus, verse, chorus, verse, bridge, chorus, etc structure.
I wish I had nicer things to say about this piece other than enjoying 4:33 to the outro. This piece did eventually get my toe tapping, but mix issues made it very hard to enjoy properly. Recommend taking a bit of time to study mixing, FX, best practices, etc. for your DAW. You've clearly got an idea of what you're doing -- otherwise, you wouldn't be bold enough to design your own perc -- just need that extra nudge in the right direction. :)
Also, congrats on making it this far in the competition!
Thanks for the feedback.
Aaaand now I'll have to start looking into East West Quantum Leap.
The opening sounds like knocking a metal drain pipe with a soft mallet. 0:19 is a fairly strong entry but could probably be louder. Later development tells me yes, volume is what I was missing here.
String arps are machine-gunning a bit on those velocities, attacks, and releases. This occurs throughout. Be sure to humanize your attacks and releases.
0:52 is a strong section. I would bring that perc there down about a dB.
1:04, nice hit there. I would bring your strings in the right channel down 2-3 dB. They're taking away from the strength and dynamics of that hybrid hit.
1:37 is a great modulation, super creepy, but driving right over that cliff -- I wish you had placed a cymbal roll with a longer tail.
Throughout, I really feel like your strings and brasses have been just too loud for the percussion to dynamically sustain. 2:36 sounds really unbalanced with the left channel. I would have placed another synth in the right just to keep things straight.
The overall sense of edge-seat is right there, but it ebbs and flows a bit with the mix itself. Overall, however, I enjoyed the track.
Thanks again for coming out to NGUAC!
Thank you for the feedback! I had a busy period that made composing under deadline worse, so I understand a lot of the critique. Should’nt be an excuse though and I’ll make sure to learn from it to future compositions! Thank you again!
Intro synths work well together, especially that perc, although I might have liked a different kick.
Vocals could have used harder compression. You're a little pitchy here and there, and I find the instrumental starts to overwhelm you at point. However, despite the talk-singing, I find this also works reasonably well.
Mix probably could have used compressing to some degree as well, but it does sound like you mixed everything very cleanly, which I appreciate.
Initially I would have been more critical of the lyrical composition, however, your diction and overall writing actually carried them well. Internal rhymes were fairly strong, as were your end rhymes in places.
I actually was not expecting "wanted" to jive so well with "quiet," but "all I wanted was some piece and quiet before I hit the bed" might ring better after "before they even crack" as "before I go BACK to bed."
Overall though, nice structure. Really surprised me with how well this turned out as your first time working with vocals seriously. Great work. Can't wait to see what places it takes you. :)
Thanks for coming out to NGUAC!
Thank you for the critiques. Compression is a very strange area to understand. I get the gist of it, like how softer sounds get louder, and louder sounds gets softer. But really applying it gets my head spinning. Plus, there so many uses for it; like side-chaining and stuff. Any tips about learning this beast? Is there like a video or articles you recommend to learn about using compression effectively?
One thing I realized about the vocals, is that "bad" singing is so hard to work with.
I make beats, metal, samples, patches, dnb, original game soundtracks, RVC voice models, and Russian/ English translation covers. Follow for monthly music producer freebies! Рада помочь русскоговорящим. Семплы вложены в ссылках вниз)))
Age 29
делаю хиты 8)
говно
США
Joined on 9/3/06