00:00
00:00
ADR3-N
I make beats, metal, samples, patches, dnb, original game soundtracks, RVC voice models, and Russian/ English translation covers. Follow for monthly music producer freebies! Рада помочь русскоговорящим. Семплы вложены в ссылках вниз)))

Age 29

делаю хиты 8)

говно

США

Joined on 9/3/06

Level:
27
Exp Points:
8,046 / 8,090
Exp Rank:
4,772
Vote Power:
6.90 votes
Audio Scouts
10+
Art Scouts
5
Rank:
Sergeant
Global Rank:
1,514
Blams:
1,096
Saves:
4,753
B/P Bonus:
24%
Whistle:
Gold
Trophies:
7
Medals:
93
Supporter:
5y 9m 16d

Someone Broke Into Every Car On My Street The Other Day. This Is Why the Gun Control Agenda Pisses Me Off.

Posted by ADR3-N - February 2nd, 2016


Literally, as the title says. I got up Sunday afternoon and came up from the basement to find mom and my grandmother arguing. Turns out, someone had broken into my mom's Sedona and my uncle's Kia Soul, strewn everything everywhere in a hurry, and stolen a bag of tools and some CDs out of the vehicles. Lucky for us, the tools were dollar store fare and the CDs were from thrift shops, but the lady next door lost $60 in change she'd left in her car, and a man on the other side of her had a gun stolen. The cops were by their houses not long after and got some good fingerprints, but my mom won't report the theft, and I'm not sure why. After all, if they have prints, it's one more theft charge, is it not?

So, besides me being pretty irate with mom for not wanting to report the theft (stupid, IMO), I'm also worried about my family. Someone had apparently also unlocked the screen door and was fiddling with the wood door to my room down in the basement, and my girlfriend said she heard some tapping in the wee hours of the morning when we stayed over this weekend, like someone was testing the door to see if they could kick it in. With the guy next door having a gun stolen, I'm worried these idiots who have been doing serial breakins will get cocky and try armed robbery. And you know what they say: "Locks are for honest people, and so are gun regulations".

I wish Mom would stop laying down and taking this crap from the wannabe gangsters and get herself a gun already, speaking of. People at my school are chiming, "You live there and don't have a gun?" Yeah, I guess I never saw the need for one until now. Granted, my view has always been to arm the general public, not the would-be criminals who would take advantage of an unarmed public; I'd hate to live somewhere like London, where the average street cop is declawed and the armed ones take crucial minutes to arrive. Here, that's minutes where a criminal could have already shot and killed your entire family before you managed to dial the police, not to mention before they actually arrived. My mom is lucky that she managed to fend off her murderous ex-husband (before my dad) and keep him from his gun cabinet long enough for local police to show up, and that's with my then teenaged sister dialing them as the guy beat her face in on that fateful night in the 80's. She'd be one less facial reconstruction and restraining order if she had a gun. It's good to be armed.

Think about it. In the Paleo/Neolithic ages, we had rocks and stone tools. Bronze Age? We had spears and swords, and maybe some bows mixed in there somewhere. In the A.D. years up 'til the mass adoption of guns, it was predominantly knives and daggers involved in robberies, muggings, and plain old murder. Did anyone ever suggest then that the public shouldn't be able to bring these same tools against their assailants, unless it was a party heavily invested in keeping its potential enemies crushed under foot? No, but the powers that were sure kept pioneering better and better weapons. Shouldn't that say something to us? If those in power are armed to protect their interest, yet they seem interested in keeping us unarmed, I think that sends a clear message. Anyway, that's besides my point for the moment. It is my firm belief that disarming the public serves two purposes: arming the criminals, and arming those that would rule over them, for good or ill.

I wouldn't be worried about my family right now if every one of them had their own glock, or .38 special, or .44 magnum. Sure, you say, "Well, they might shoot someone! What if it goes off accidentally? What if children get a hold of one of your guns?" But I say, even with your gun control, what if someone smuggles in a gun from another country? Remember what happened with alcohol during prohibition days? How many people died for that watered down booze -- and what about moonshiners today? What about the war on drugs we have making the cartels fat and happy off of illegitimate funds and lives cut short -- drug debts? What if someone uses one of those illegal guns to shoot my family, full-knowing they have no means to protect themselves without having to go unlock a cabinet on the other side of the house -- and trying not to get shot in the back of the head in the process -- or worse, bringing a knife to a gunfight?

I have the feeling those pushing gun control have no idea what it's like to be confronted with actual armed criminals in daily life. Yeah, I've been shot at before. I've had a gun held to my head. I've even shot a few rounds myself. Nothing is more sobering than a cold metallic barrel to the temple, but I'd rather be able to have a gun of my own than kid myself and think that some regulations are going to stop a determined no-gooder from getting their own. I'd rather at least have a chance of beating them to the trigger, you know? I want my family to at least have that same chance.


Comments

Glocks are a girl's best friend, or so i've been told by friends across the pond.

In my neck of the woods the constitution expressly states that the citizenry shall bear no firearms to ensure the continuation of government, so as far as small blessings go you at least have the liberty to arm yourself if you so choose.

That said, merely owning a firearm does not automatically improve ones safety, it's not a magical sigil that repels ghosts and goblins just by lying around.

Like any other tool one will have to invest time and effort to learn how to use it, preferably without being disarmed at the drop of a hat and thereafter perpetually train to maintain this particular aptitude, lest it's presence be more of a future liability then a viable option for defence.

Stay safe.

Wow, what country do you live in? I was aware a lot expressly forbade guns -- but "to ensure the continuity of government"? Woah. To say that here would be almost tyrannical, especially since many in the frontier lands use them primarily for protection against wild animals.

Thanks for the kind words and advice! I needed that.

I hail from the Netherlands, or EU district 2 in certain circles.

It is a tyrannical or autocratic if you will sort of measure, it dates back to 1919 shortly after the conclusion of the first world war.

Popular uprisings, particularly communist ones were taking place in various countries across europe during this period, the dutch government sought to prevent that by instating said law, which technically did not ban firearm ownership outright but it completely prohibited the sales of them to the rather vaguely termed "unauthorised" persons as well as allow for confiscation if people not meet whatever the criteria was.

The legislation has been through revision during the 80s and the 90s, one is theoretically allowed to own a firearm but it is bound by an incredible amount of hoops to jump through, not least of all submitting to random home searches by law enforcement and the dictum that both the firearm and it's ammunition must be kept in wall mounted safes in seperate rooms at all times.

I'm sure you can imagine just how useful that is during an immediate crisis, so along with prohibitive costs and the risk of having the firearm confiscated on a whim and the fact that one is not allowed to carry the item anywhere at all besides a shooting range, legal gun ownership is not terribly popular here.

Wow, that's absolutely insane, and quite useless, as you mentioned. And I'm sure the government uses any case of illegal ownership in a breakin as an excuse to keep the inane laws in place. Seems sort of like what they're doing here, insisting you have to keep guns in a locked cabinet and keeping records of your ownership so that they can send a SWAT team down on you whenever they want. The reality is that, with a disarmed populace, you've basically put your entire state at risk of foreign invasion, made your people a bunch of toothless sheep. Shame the governments these days care more about keeping themselves in power than preserving their people and way of life.

You are entirely correct and that is exactly what happened when the german tanks rolled across the border after world war 2 kicked off in earnest which was not all that long after these measures were taken.

That said, the movement to disarm all developed nations and convert them to various flavors of police state, in so far as either or both these things are not already the case, is still under way and it does not appear that this tide will turn one way or the other as long as the majority of people is unable or unwilling to see that this is indeed the case.

Whether this is good or bad depends on ones disposition towards global governance, if societies as a whole refuse to improve by leaps and bounds then the current crop of would be nobility will just carry on as they have thus far and i don't think merely getting better ones or hanging them all will change anything either.

The core of the issue is never the arms, it is whether conditions and incentives exist for them to be used negatively that matters. Switzerland and the netherlands for example are about on par in terms of violent crime which is to say very low, one is armed to the teeth the other is virtually unarmed, both are well to do and hardcore liberal societies though which i venture accounts for this state of affairs better then the availability of firearms.